Infocast’s 2022 Solar Finance Summit Recap

By: Kacie Peters

Director, Industry Relationships


Infocast's solar deal-making conference was one of the first casualties of the 2020 shutdowns, so it is fitting that it was one of the first national "normal" conferences to return post-pandemic. The event brings together financiers, attorneys, and a smattering of business development professionals to learn about trends in underwriting and contracts, but also to meet in conference rooms, suites, and lobbies to solidify the partnerships that will define the industry for the following year. If you didn't manage to wear your finest blue suit sans tie and meet in Scottsdale, here is a summary of the most discussed topics at the public education sessions and during cocktail hours – as written by a first-time attendee. 


Supply Chain Issues Loom Large

While EPC professionals, procurement specialists, and most manufacturers don't typically attend the finance summit, the spotlight was certainly on their work. Many sessions addressed the challenges of obtaining nearly every solar component and included significant discussion. Global manufacturing shutdowns and shipping delays are causing projects to miss their COD deadlines throughout the country. For the finance and legal community, these delays have a two-fold impact: 

  • What to do about deadlines: Tax equity runs on a calendar year deployment – it's why so many construction teams work round the clock in Q4 to ensure commissioning before New Year's Eve. Even the best project manager can't make transformers appear when they are sitting at a shipping dock, so financiers discussed flexible structures, including the potential to develop projects in phases rather than as a large installation. Likewise, the legal community is addressing the evolving world of force majeure and liquidated damages should a project run behind schedule due to supply shortages. 

  • Contract structures to flex PPA rates: The development cycle for larger projects is long. Today's equipment and labor available for projects are more expensive than foretold when a developer signed a land option in the pre-pandemic world. The finance community enjoys a locked-in PPA rate as much as an offtaker, but how can contracts be negotiated if the inputs change? Amazon, one of the country's largest procurers of offsite PPAs, has created a transparent structure for realignment. It won't surprise me if other large buyers follow suit or risk abandoning otherwise promising projects. 


Winter Storm Uri Changed the Game

It's telling that a winter storm in one ISO 12 months ago is still newsworthy. Winter Storm Uri shut down much of the Texas grid and wreaked havoc on supply contracts in the state. Shaped hedges were always risky, but before Uri, the finance community didn't fully understand the reality of a grid shutdown in otherwise predictable production technologies like wind and solar. Most conference attendees agreed that this tool is no longer the safe bet that it once was. Still, to their credit, much of the conference focused on taking more market risk, including increased tolerance for basis risk, ancillary service revenue streams for storage, and shorter-term PPAs. The lesson seems that if grid stability isn't guaranteed, we need to adapt to finance more technologies and a greater renewable penetration to harden infrastructure. The buyer community agrees, with resiliency at the top of the mind for buyers, and they may finally be willing to pay for it. This development is a good sign for the future of local solar and storage markets. 


How Will Direct Pay Impact the Capital Stack?

It may feel like the sandwich of "tax equity, sponsor equity, and debt" is as old as solar deployment. Before 2011, the federal government experimented with grant structures as an alternative to tax equity. Now the promise of the Build Back Better legislation is leaving many hopeful that we can reinvent this expensive piece of the capital stack yet again. It's probably no surprise that the tax attorneys in the sessions argued that there will always be room for the traditional capital stack. The 1-year delay in getting a cash payment could make developers squirm, especially the smaller ones. Will the industry shift to another form of debt to cover that delay? How "certain" are the payments? Will a fair market value step-up be allowed? Could the IRS recapture them? We won't know these answers until the bill passes. 

Additionally, it may be tempting to say that a cash payment would be a welcome reprise for small developers. However, we're seeing so much consolidation in the industry that the more prominent firms will likely be the ones shaping how these new projects get financed. Larger developers have always had more sway in the financial product market. Now that many of the investors in these developers are emerging with their own equity to invest, they will likely have a more significant hand in the market. As such, perhaps the market consolidation could continue. 


Stray Observations: 

  • ESG Impact: Offtakers and developers are increasingly likely to factor "Environmental, Social, and Governance" metrics into their procurements. The industry has developed detailed accounting for the environmental piece – carbon accounting and RECs each have a monetary value. However, as companies want social impact, how do we measure community impact? Is a premium impact PPA financeable? 

  • Community solar is growing yet still largely misunderstood: The community solar sessions were tucked into the event's final day, so most of my exposure was through networking discussions. Many financiers are still wrapping their heads around underwriting mechanisms such as looking at offtaker credit profiles as a proxy for subscriber churn, despite the community solar industry creating ways to address this natural event. Market diversity will help the most sophisticated players, but everyone should get up to speed quickly. 

  • There is still too much money chasing too few projects: As we've seen in recent years, everyone seems to have the capital to deploy, and the disconnect between project supply and financier demand is always on display. This uneven distribution is again causing the finance community to promise innovation, including accepting more merchant risk and entering projects earlier than in the past. We expect these to be the key areas where banks and other financiers create space between their competitors. 


Final Thought: It's Good to Be Back 

When conferences ceased in 2020, the industry lost a lot of perspectives. It was harder to gauge who the big players were or what trends were actual or just aspirational. Seeing 2,000 people in person was off-putting at first, but only when we can see big data and share project information openly can the virtue of collaboration finally come to light. In summary, I saw a lot of blue suits last week, and we're probably better off for it. Thanks, Infocast.